On Belinda Stronach’s move to the Liberal caucus

At first glance, it is very easy to consider the decision by Belinda Stronach, MP for the Ontario riding of Newmarket-Aurora, as unprincipled and hypocritical – and that’s the tact the federal Conservative caucus wants us to take. However, after taking a moment to reflect on this historic and dramatic bolt from Conservatives to the Liberal caucus, one begins to realize that she was very unhappy in caucus and in the party.

To be sure, critics of the bold departure of Stronach to the Liberals ask why she bothered to engineer the merger of the former Progressive Conservative and Canadian Alliance parties in the fall of 2003 and subsequent run for its leadership in early spring of 2004 if she had no intention of staying there for very long. Both points are valid; however, consider that the party still, over a year and a half since the merger, does not resemble that of the old Progressive Conservative Party of Canada.

Let’s be clear: it does not support marriage by couples of the same gender; waffles on whether or not it would use the Canadian constitution’s notwithstanding clause to overturn judges decisions in nine provinces and territories that guaranteed the fundamental right of equality for all citizens regardless of different character or mental traits; believes in unusually harsh U.S. style mandatory minimum sentencing; would press for a sharply curtailed National Parole Board; wants to see a return to the wrong-headed U.S.-like “war on drugs” campaign instead of a so-called four-pillars approach; and supports an increased reliance on oil, among other things. These are policies the vast majority of Canadians, including those in crucial central Canada do not, and will not, support.

Ms. Stronach differs from her party on many of those issues mentioned above, including same-gendered marriage. She’s quite socially-progressive. She may be a so-called “blue Tory” when it comes to sound economic policy and tight fiscal management, but I don’t believe that prohibits her from the Liberal Party of Canada. Prime Minister Martin shares those ideals, in fact.

Are people really so shallow that they seek to see her as a “turncoat”, a traitor, or someone without morals and ethics? I choose to take what she said at face value and strongly believe she’ll fit much better in the Liberal caucus. Besides, it’s not like she has much of a chance for the leadership of the Liberal party considering that shallow view of her that quite a few, although I’m confident not most, Canadians share. Because of this, it’s even more abundantly clear she didn’t make the switch because of “leadership ambitions” as the television media and its pundits are quick to “analyze” and ponder.

I am absolutely thrilled she has made this move and I’m not even a member of any federal or provincial political party, not just because it brings stability to the Parliament of Canada and the government but for her own personal and professional happiness where she should be much more content.

Moreover, because of that unhappiness and a feeling that she was out of place in the Conservative caucus, I believe she would have went to the Liberals to sit as a backbench MP with some sort of relatively insignificant parliamentary secretary role. However, I believe that it was probably Mr. Martin who made the offer of Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development and Minister Responsible for Democratic Renewal, not the suggestion that she sought and demanded a cabinet post.

As a footnote on the riding of Newmarket-Aurora, it is not likely she will lose the Toronto-area riding given its electoral history. In the 2004 general election as arguably the most high-profile Conservative candidate, she beat Liberal challenger Martha Hall-Findlay by only 711 votes, according to Elections Canada official voting results. So, given her already-high prominence and the riding’s electoral voting pattern, it is very likely she stands a better chance of winning now as a Liberal than as a Conservative where Hall-Findlay, who has a agreed to step down as the Newmarket-Aurora Liberal candidate of record, could’ve knocked her off in the next election – which would’ve been equally embarrassing for the Conservatives.


One thought on “On Belinda Stronach’s move to the Liberal caucus

  1. Interesting insight, Doug. Perhaps you’re right in saying that Belinda will find a closer fit in the Liberal party. However, the people in her constituency voted for a conservative, and I have trouble with that. If I vote for a particular candidate because of his/her affiliation with a specific party, then I feel betrayed when that person jumps parties. It’s always a dilemma at election time–do you vote for the candidate or for the party? I also find it a little suspicious to see Belinda jump to the Liberals, not as a backbencher, but one with a little more power–seems like a bit of a power trip to me. My former MP, Val Merideth, jumped ship when she was in Ottawa… paid the price, too, in the end. People don’t appreciate their MPs changing sides!
    I did enjoy reading your thoughts, though… made me think a little more. I tend to make snap judgements. One more thing, though… what about poor Peter MacKay? She was pretty nasty in public there, from what I hear.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s